[Pvfs2-developers] patch: alternate AIO implementation
Phil Carns
pcarns at wastedcycles.org
Thu Aug 10 18:11:57 EDT 2006
Murali Vilayannur wrote:
> Nice investigation Phil!
> Results look great. Isnt this approach similar to what Julian was doing
> with the threaded I/O work in the kunkel branch? (with the exception of
> the O_DIRECT stuff?)
I'm not sure- I haven't actually been following those commits that
closely yet. This is something we just cobbled together a while back as
an experiment but weren't really sure if it was useful at the time (it
failed to fix a different problem that we were looking at which later
ended up being a kernel bug). We only yesterday ran tests that showed
it being helpful for a real world scenario.
> It also looks like the trove backend could benefit from the readx, writex
> posix extension patches to the kernel and ext3, although that would be a
> lot of work I guess..
Yeah, probably so. I doubt we will be able to work with it in our
environment until some of the major vendors ship kernels with
readx/writex available...
-Phil
More information about the Pvfs2-developers
mailing list