[Pvfs2-developers] concurrent sms

[Walt Ligon]

Yeah, I did that because I figured it would provide continuity.  Then I 
decided it was ugly for exactly the reason you stated and changed it. 
Then decided the union was a pain in the ass and dropped it in favor of 
a void pointer.  :-)

Walt

Sam Lang wrote:
> 
> Hi Walt,
> 
> The state machine stuff you've got in WALT3 branch looks like its coming 
> along.  Nice to see those cleanups to the state_machine functions.  I 
> have a minor nit about this:
> 
> /* Op State - this is the user-specific (client or server) information
> * that must be maintained for each running state machine - if new
> * "users" are created the need to be added to this union
> */
> union PINT_OP_STATE
> {
>     struct PINT_server_op s; /* server specific fields */
>     struct PINT_client_sm c; /* client specific fields */
> };
> 
> The caps makes me think of #define, which I think it used to be.  Could 
> that be PINT_op_state instead?  Or is this the union that is going to be 
> replaced with a void*?
> 
> -sam
> _______________________________________________
> Pvfs2-developers mailing list
> Pvfs2-developers at beowulf-underground.org
> http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-developers