[Pvfs2-developers] Status of the head

[Bradley W Settlemyer]

   The last integration bug I found could be replicated simply by using 
pvfs-cp to copy files into an empty pvfs2 filesystem as I recall.

   Whenever I get everything working, you are welcome to use my datatype 
testing program, except that it requires my patches to mpich2 to run 
correctly (which I just mailed to, but I'm not sure are appropriate for 
the main romio tree).

   Thanks for the note, I will begin reintegrating with the head now.

Cheers,
Brad


Robert Latham wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 02:48:49PM -0400, Bradley W Settlemyer wrote:
> 
>>Hello
>>
>>  The last 3 or 4 times that I've moved my work into sync with the head 
>>of the source tree, the head has been broken.  I want to be a little 
>>more cautious this time with my work -- I find a bunch of bugs, but they 
>>mostly turn out to not be due to my changes, and it takes me several 
>>days to figure out which bugs are from me vs. the tree.  What is the 
>>current status of the head?  Is it in a known good state, a thought to 
>>be good state, or a broken state?
> 
> 
> Hey brad
> 
> I think head is pretty stable at this moment now that we've fixed the
> last rash of nightly test failures.  The tinderbox runs are really all
> I have to base that on:  the jazz failures are due to some compile
> errors in the MPICH2 nightly snapshot I used. 
> 
> I'd love to add some more tests to our nightlies: do you have some
> test cases I can add to the nightlies? or are the bugs you've found
> in the past too closely tied to your work?
> 
> ==rob
>