[Pvfs2-developers] touch_atime() configure test

[Robert Latham]

On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 06:07:40PM +0200, Phil Carns wrote:
> I think the results from the touch_atime() configure test are actually 
> inverted:
> 
> AC_MSG_RESULT(yes)
> AC_DEFINE(HAVE_TOUCH_ATIME, 1, Define if kernel has touch_atime routine),
> AC_MSG_RESULT(no), 
> 
> 
> should be:
> 
> AC_MSG_RESULT(no), 
>         AC_MSG_RESULT(yes)
> AC_DEFINE(HAVE_TOUCH_ATIME, 1, Define if kernel has touch_atime routine),

You're correct of course, phil.  I've fixed my mistake in CVS

> Apparently some 2.6 kernels have both touch_atime and update_atime, 
> because it didn't cause a problem on the first system I built on. 
> However, it doesn't work on 2.4 kernels.

Yup, 2.6 had update_atime right up until 2.6.16.  

==rob

-- 
Rob Latham
Mathematics and Computer Science Division    A215 0178 EA2D B059 8CDF
Argonne National Labs, IL USA                B29D F333 664A 4280 315B