[Pvfs2-developers] nightly automated testing

[Robert Latham]

On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 03:15:59PM -0400, Pete Wyckoff wrote:
> What happened to automated testing?  I found one compile problem and
> what appears to be a pretty basic SEGV.  Does the automated testing
> not try the kernel interface?  I'm not particularly  annoyed at
> finding these issues, just confused that they survived more than one
> night.

We do only have a few configurations.  We test the kernel interface on
two machines (gil, fc5; and lain, debian/testing), mpi-io on another.
How are you getting immediate completion? via CFLAGS or configure
commands when you build, or is it something ib-specific?  Definitely
want to make sure we catch at least these regressions if they come
back.

> I'd be happy to see "build broke" messages go to the list every
> night if it is easy to do that.  Helps the guilty parties find bugs
> faster.

Hm. we could probably hack something up. There's also an RDF feed that
might help?
http://www.pvfs.org/pvfs2-nightly-builds/tinderbox2/all_trees.rdf.rdf

==rob

-- 
Rob Latham
Mathematics and Computer Science Division    A215 0178 EA2D B059 8CDF
Argonne National Labs, IL USA                B29D F333 664A 4280 315B