[Pvfs2-developers] fs.conf integrity checks
Rob Ross
rross at mcs.anl.gov
Tue Sep 12 10:10:52 EDT 2006
Quick uneducated question: this isn't automatically done on *every*
mount, right?
Rob
Phil Carns wrote:
> Murali Vilayannur wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> Just a heads-up..
>> I have checked in a patch that will allow the pvfs2-ping utility to
>> verify
>> if the fs.conf files obtained from all the servers for a given fsid
>> is the same by checking against their crypto check sum (SHA1 right now)
>> Please let me know if you have any serious objections to doing it the way
>> I have done right now..
>> Thanks,
>> Murali
>
> Hi Murali,
>
> This is integrated into fs_add so that the test is performed
> automatically at mount time now, correct? We had done something similar
> in the pvfs2-validate utility, but I think it will be good to have it
> integrated into the normal mount process.
>
> I haven't looked at the code, but I have a few functionality comments
> after playing with it this morning:
>
> - Is it possible to filter whitespace and comments out of the config
> file before gathering whatever information you need for comparison, or
> do you want to enforce that the fs.conf files be verbatim identical?
>
> - I ran one test where a server had an extra line in its configuration
> file, and that showed up fine as a mount error with information in the
> log files showing the size difference. However, I ran another test
> where I just changed the value of UnexpectedRequests from "50" to "51",
> and this did not generate any error. Is there anything in particular
> you have to do to enable the checksum tests in addition to the size tests?
>
> -Phil
> _______________________________________________
> Pvfs2-developers mailing list
> Pvfs2-developers at beowulf-underground.org
> http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-developers
>
More information about the Pvfs2-developers
mailing list