[Pvfs2-developers] some testing questions
Rob Ross
rross at mcs.anl.gov
Thu Apr 26 01:50:25 EDT 2007
:)
Murali Vilayannur wrote:
> Sam,
> Getting code into the mainline kernel is an uphill task and is really
> not worth the pain. A lot of our code may get restructured (especially
> some of the vfs/dcache related hooks)
> Once we drop all support for 2.4 kernels, I think maintaining configure
> checks
> and the #ifdef checks in the kernel module don't seem that daunting
> (hopefully ;))
> thanks,
> Murali
>
>> Since the client has to be shipped separately, and the versions
>> between kernel module and client have to match, I think it ends up
>> being easier to just ship them together. That being said, I've been
>> smacked by the #ifdef checks in the kernel module in order to support
>> all the different kernel versions still out there. It can make the
>> code hard to follow. Someone with more history can answer this
>> better though I'm sure.
>>
>> -sam
>>
>> >
>> > - David Brown
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pvfs2-developers mailing list
>> Pvfs2-developers at beowulf-underground.org
>> http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-developers
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Pvfs2-developers mailing list
> Pvfs2-developers at beowulf-underground.org
> http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-developers
>
More information about the Pvfs2-developers
mailing list