[Pvfs2-developers] dbench and pvfs2_bufmap race
Phil Carns
carns at mcs.anl.gov
Mon Jan 21 14:07:12 EST 2008
Out of curiosity I ran ltp against pvfs trunk to see if it would find
this problem. I didn't find an exact match, but rename06 gives an
interesting result. Replicating on the command line looks like this:
root@(none):/mnt/pvfs2/testdir# mkdir dir1
root@(none):/mnt/pvfs2/testdir# mv dir1 dir1/dir2
root@(none):/mnt/pvfs2/testdir# ls
root@(none):/mnt/pvfs2/testdir#
That "mv" command is supposed to fail. I'm not sure where dir1 went :)
-Phil
Phil Carns wrote:
> It looks like dbench is hanging on a rename of a file within a
> subdirectory. I can replicate it outside of dbench like this:
>
> root@(none):/mnt/pvfs2# pwd
> /mnt/pvfs2
> root@(none):/mnt/pvfs2# mkdir testdir
> root@(none):/mnt/pvfs2# touch testdir/foo
> root@(none):/mnt/pvfs2# mv testdir/foo testdir/bar
>
> Everything works fine if I instead try to rename something with no
> subdirectory:
>
> root@(none):/mnt/pvfs2# touch foo
> root@(none):/mnt/pvfs2# mv foo bar # so far so good
>
> I don't think the "mkdir" and "touch" steps are relevant other than just
> for an example. I think get the same hang if the file and subdir
> already exist when pvfs is mounted.
>
> -Phil
>
> Phil Carns wrote:
>> Whoops - it looks like the pvfs2-client-core crash didn't really have
>> much to do w/ dbench. That was a red herring (a system/compile
>> problem on my end was what really triggered that), but I think the
>> fixes to address the bufmap race conditions ended up being a good
>> thing anyway :)
>>
>> Anyway, I can't vouch for the current state of dbench with pvfs2
>> trunk; I think it probably still hangs the client machine just as before.
>>
>> -Phil
>>
>> Robert Latham wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 06:37:52PM -0600, Phil Carns wrote:
>>>> 1) dbench somehow kills pvfs2-client-core (not sure why yet)
>>>
>>> Hi Phil
>>> Thanks for taking a look at the dbench failures. I confirmed
>>> yesterday that revision 1.32 of
>>> src/kernel/linux-2.6/dcache.c is the last revision to pass dbench.
>>> Sam already knows that's a suspect area. I'm just saying by starting
>>> with HEAD and reverting that one file to 1.32 dbench (and all the
>>> other nightlies) pass.
>>> Why do subsequent revisions make pvfs2-client-core blow up? no idea.
>>> It's no small change, and related if I remember correctly to Sam and
>>> Kevin debugging some BGP issues, so reverting it doesn't seem like the
>>> right thing to do.
>>>
>>> ==rob
>>>
>>
>
More information about the Pvfs2-developers
mailing list