[PVFS2-users] setting up multihome with same protocol
pcarns at wastedcycles.org
Wed Oct 12 16:12:44 EDT 2005
If this works as is, then it will be by pure luck :) BMI should be
getting both TCP addresses passed to it (this much is already in place
to support using multiple methods), but it isn't doing anything clever
Rob Ross wrote:
> I'm not surprised that this doesn't work quite right at the moment. Are
> we at least capturing the two addresses and passing them to BMI so that
> it *could* try both of them?
> Robert Latham wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 11:17:05AM -0500, Robert Latham wrote:
>>> (5) Verifying that all servers are responding...
>>> meta servers:
>> sorry, left off the rest of the information:
>> (5) Verifying that all servers are responding...
>> meta servers:
>> [E 12:26:58.290061] *** msgpairarray_completion_fn: msgpair failed, no
>> retry: Co
>> nnection timed out
>> tcp://172.30.1.202:3334,tcp://126.96.36.199:3335 Failure!
>> noop_all_servers: Connection timed out
>> Failure: could not communicate with one of the servers.
>> i.e. the client is getting both addresses for the server. strace(2)
>> further tells me the client is connecting to the first addresss. That
>> first address is unreachable from this client. What i thought would
>> happen is the client would get an error from trying to connect to the
>> first address, then try to connect to the second address.
> PVFS2-users mailing list
> PVFS2-users at beowulf-underground.org
More information about the PVFS2-users