[Pvfs2-users] RE: lustre and pvfs comparison

[Dries Kimpe]

Installation wise,
compared to lustre, PVFS is unbelievable easy to install...

  Greetings,
  Dries


Pappas, Bill schreef:
>
>  
>
> > I'm looking for some feedback from luster and pvfs users.
>
> >
>
> > Specifically ---I'm interested in any thoughts on why one would go to 
> luster or pvfs
>
> > for their hpc file system needs.
>
> > What fundamentally makes pvfs different from lustre?
>
> > I realize that one may claim (that for specific requirements) luster
>
> > or pvfs may be more suitable or just plain better.
>
> > So....I'd like to know which requirement(s) led you to luster or pvfs?
>
> > I would definitely like to know any limitations you've seen in either
>
> > fs.  Installation complications? Scalabilty. Reliability. Speed.
>
>  
>
>  
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bill Pappas - System Integration Engineer - SAN
>
> St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
>
> 332 North Lauderdale
>
> Memphis, TN 38105
>
> Danny Thomas Tower - Room D1010
>
> Mail Stop 312
>
> 901-495-4549
>
>  
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pvfs2-users mailing list
> Pvfs2-users at beowulf-underground.org
> http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-users
>   


Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm