Re: 回复:Re: [Pvfs2-users] Samba over PVFS2 performance
olson at mcs.anl.gov
Thu Oct 12 10:14:17 EDT 2006
For the mix of jobs we do on our cluster here, having read caching
would be wonderful, especially if it is a per-directory option. We
run a lot of jobs that use fairly small input files over and over
again, and pay a big price if we try to use PVFS for them.
On Oct 11, 2006, at 10:49 PM, Murali Vilayannur wrote:
> Again, we do not do caching, although it won't be too hard to do so
> using the generic page cache functions *if* you don't mind stale
> data and terrible performance.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pvfs2-users